EFL Learners’ Strategy Instruction, Their Self-regulation, and Writing Achievement

Document Type : Original Article

Authors
Fatemeh Lotfi 1
MohammadJavad Bahrami 1
Mohammad Darijani 2
1 General Department of Education, Kerman Province, Ministry of Education, Kerman, Iran.
2 Assistant Professor of TEFL, Department of English Language, Kerman Branch, Farhangian University, Kerman, Iran
10.22034/jes.2026.244787
Abstract
Innovation in educational media is crucial. The study investigates the best game elements for improving EFL students' reading comprehension, the best educational stages to use gamification strategies, and how gamification affects student engagement and motivation in 8–11-year-olds. Gamified applications and pen-and-paper assignments are compared using standardized reading evaluations. The sample of 70 normally developing children is evenly divided into two groups for 12 hours of school instruction. All groups improved their reading speed and accuracy, with the experimental gamified training group showing a slightly larger impact, although this difference was not statistically significant. Gamification's effects on control and experimental groups were examined using mixed techniques. The pre-test, post-test, pre-survey, and post-survey quantitative results showed that gamification improved reading comprehension and engagement in the experimental group compared to the control group that used traditional study methods. Gamification was also liked by experimental group members for its capacity to improve reading engagement and learning environment. Gamification is proposed as a creative way to shift a reading lesson from teacher-centered to student-centered. This research gives educators evidence-based tips for designing and implementing gamified reading comprehension exercises that improve learning. Gamification helps EFL teachers create engaging and fun learning environments that boost reading comprehension and active student involvement. Gamification is a new English teaching method. These findings emphasize the need of complete training and encourage more research on how gamified technology affect real-world skills and motivators. Gamification's pros and cons must be understood to be effectively integrated into educational programs.
Keywords
Writing
Writing strategy
Self-regulation
EFL Learners
Subjects
Bakery, M. S., & Alsamadani, H. A. (2014). Improving the persuasive 
essay writing of students of Arabic as a foreign language: Effect of 
self-regulation strategy development. Procedia-Social and 
Behavioral, 182, 89-97.
Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social 
cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Boud, D., Keogh, R. & Walker, D. (1985). Reflection: Turning 
experience into learning. London: Kogan Page.
Connor, U. (2002). New directions in contrastive rhetoric. TESOL 
Quarterly, 36, 493-510.
Dehghan, M., & Chalak, A. (2016). Code glosses in academic writing: 
The comparison of Iranian and native authors. Research in English 
Language Pedagogy, 3(2), 21-29.
Dornyei, Z. (2001). Motivational Strategies in the Language Classroom.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Graham, S., & Harris, K. R. (2005). Writing better: Effective strategies 
for teaching students with learning difficulties. Baltimore, MD: Paul 
H. Brookes Publishing Co.
Harris, K. R., &Graham, S. (2006). Programmatic intervention research: 
Illustrations from the evolution of self-regulated strategy 
development. Learning Disability Quarterly, 22, 251-262. 
Harris, K. R., Graham, S., & Adkins, M. (2015). Practice-based 
professional development and self-regulated strategy development 
for Tier 2, at-risk writers in second grade. Contemporary 
Educational Psychology, 40, 5-16.55 Lotfi et al., J. Edu. Stu.,01(01) 2026
Hashemnezhad, H. & Hashemnezhad, N. (2012). A comparative study of 
product, process, and post-process approaches in Iranian EFL 
students’ writing skill. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 
3(4), 722-729.
Heaton, J. B. (1988). Writing English language tests. London and New 
York: Longman.
Kim, Y. (2005). Cultivating reflective thinking: The effect of reflective 
thinking tool on learners’ performance and metacognitive 
awareness in the context of on-line learning. Unpublished doctoral 
thesis, Pennsylvania State University, Pennsylvania.
Koo, Y.L. (2008). Language, culture and literacy: Meaning-making in 
global contexts. Bangi, Selangor: Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia.
Kuiper, R. (2002). Enhancing metacognition through the reflective use 
of self-regulated learning strategies. The Journal of Continuing 
Education in Nursing, 33(2), 78-87
Little, M. A. (2007). Self-regulated strategies development for improving 
the writing skills of students with internalizing behavior patterns and 
writing concerns. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Vanderbilt 
University. 
Lynch, R., & Dembo, M. (2004). The relationship between selfregulation and online learning in a blended learning context. The 
International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 
5(2), 1-14
Mason, L. H., Harris, K. R., & Graham, S. (2011). Self-regulated strategy 
development for students with writing difficulties. Theory into 
Practice, 50(1), 20-27.
Mertens, N. L. (Ed.). (2010). Writing: Process, tools and techniques. 
New York: Nova Science Publisher.
Moon, J. (1999). Reflection in learning & professional development: 
Theory & practice. London: Kogan Page.
Nabavi Ekhlas, N., & Shangarffam, N. (2012). The relationship between 
determinant factors of self-regulation strategies and main language 
skills and overall proficiency. Procedia-Social and Behavioral 
Sciences. 70, 137-147.
Naghdipour, B., & Emeagwali, O. L. (2013). Assessing the level of 
reflective thinking in ELT students. Procedia-Social and Behavioral 
Science, 83, 266-271.
Oxford, R. L., (2011). Teaching and Researching Language Learning 
Strategies. Harlow, England: Longman.
Phan, H. P. (2009). Exploring students’ reflective thinking practice, deep 
processing strategies, effort, and achievement goal orientations. 
Educational Psychology, 29(3), 297-313.
Phan, H. P. (2010). Critical thinking as a self-regulated process 
component in teaching and learning. Psicothema, 22(2), 284-292.
Pintrich, P. R. (2004). A conceptual framework for assessing motivation 
and self-regulated learning in college students. Educational 
Psychology Review, 16, 385-407.
Pintrich, P. R., Smith, D. A. F., Garcia, T., & McKeachie, W. J. (1993). 
Reliability and predictive validity and reliability of the motivated 
strategies for learning questionnaire (MSLQ). Educational and 
Psychological Measurement, 53, 801-813.
Rudd, R. D. (2007). Defining critical thinking. Techniques, 82(7), 46-49.
Ruohotie, P. (2002). Motivation and self-regulation in learning. In H. 
Niemi & P. Ruohotie (Eds.), Theoretical understandings for 
learning in the virtual university, (pp. 37-72). Research 
Centre for Vocational Education, University of Tampere.
Wilson, Y. & Murdoch, K. (2006). Helping your pupils to think for 
themselves. New York: Routledge.
Wolters, C. (2010). Self-regulated learning and the 21st century 
competencies. Paper prepared for the NRC Planning Meeting on 21st
Century Competencies. 
Wong, B. & Butter, D. (2012). Learning about learning disabilities. New 
York: Elsevier Academic Press.
Zimmerman, B. J. (1990). Self-regulated learning and academic 
achievement: An overview. Educational Psychologist, 25(1), 3-17.